Write a single argumentative paragraph (160–200 words) in English arguing whether municipal governments should…
Publicado por Alexandre Lombardi dos Santos, fundador do GeraProva
Debater questões polêmicas de relevância social, analisando diferentes argumentos e opiniões, para formular, negociar e sustentar posições, frente à análise de perspectivas distintas.
Fonte: Base Nacional Comum Curricular (MEC).Questão
Write a single argumentative paragraph (160–200 words) in English arguing whether municipal governments should subsidize public transport to reduce traffic and pollution. Use at least four linking words that indicate addition, condition, contrast/opposition and conclusion; underline each linking word.
✍️ Questão dissertativa: veja abaixo a resposta esperada e a explicação.
Resposta esperada
Municipal governments should subsidize public transport to reduce traffic and pollution because accessible transit encourages people to leave cars at home. _Moreover_, well-funded buses and trains lower per-passenger emissions and shorten commute times; _for instance_, reduced delays and faster trips can shift commuter choices and increase productivity. _If_ fares are affordable and services run reliably, ridership will rise and private-car use will fall, easing congestion on major arteries. _However_, subsidies must be coupled with investment in infrastructure and policy measures such as dedicated lanes, integrated ticketing and safe bike routes to be genuinely effective. _In addition_, targeted discounts for low-income households improve equity and broaden the social benefits of transport policy. Economic analyses show that the long-term savings from reduced congestion, improved air quality and lower healthcare costs often outweigh subsidy expenses; _therefore_, subsidizing public transit is a cost-effective strategy for climate action and urban mobility. By combining subsidies with sensible planning and monitoring, cities can meet environmental targets while enhancing residents' daily lives.
Explicação
A resposta apresenta argumentos claros e bem estruturados que defendem a necessidade de subsídios para o transporte público, utilizando exemplos concretos e dados econômicos. Além disso, faz uso adequado de palavras de ligação que ajudam a organizar as ideias e a mostrar relações de causa e efeito, contrastes e conclusões. Essa abordagem torna o texto persuasivo e coeso, atendendo aos requisitos da questão.
Raio-X da questão
subsídios ao transporte público
avaliacao
estrutura de parágrafo argumentativo · uso de conectivos em inglês
Revisar o uso de conectivos em textos argumentativos.
Os alunos podem falhar ao não usar os conectivos corretamente, resultando em um texto desconexo e sem fluidez.
cidadania_etica
pensamento_critico
cotidiano
Questões parecidas com resolução
- Select the connector that correctly expresses cause–effect: 'The factory automated its lines; _____, production costs…
- Choose the linking word that best completes the sentence: 'She studied hard for months; _____, she failed the exam.'
- Write a short analysis (˜100–150 words) explaining how three different linking words or phrases (e.g., however…
- Select the connector that best conveys contrast in this sentence: "The policy was unpopular; _____, it produced…
- Write a short analysis (approx. 120–160 words) explaining how linking words such as 'however', 'therefore' and…
- In the sentence: "Because he missed the bus, he arrived late; consequently, he apologized." which linking word signals…
🔎 Procurar outra questão
Procure no banco do GeraProva pelo tema ou por um trecho do enunciado. Cada questão já vem com resolução comentada e a análise de cada alternativa.
Professor: monte a prova com questões como esta, com gabarito e folha de respostas, em 30 segundos. Ver planos · Blog
